Serial and binary search in java
The record with student ID will be stored in data as before, but where will student ID be placed? Simply put, I believe that you should do everything in your power to ensure that your programs are correct. But with chaining, each serial and binary search in java position can hold many records, and the load factor might be higher than 1. Open addressing requires that the array be initialized so that the program can test if an array position already contains a record.
But first, we present a simple search method, the serial search and its run-time analysis. As you say, we use programming languages which let you compose things. I refuse to lose sleep over this bug, because it will not be triggered under credible circumstances.
Modular arithmetic Another interesting problem in the same class is that of a wraparound counter, such as the bit quantity on Windows machines that wraps every 42 days. Any response on this? For serial search, the best-case occurs when the target is found at the front of the array, requiring only one array access. Indeed, many programmers prefer tests over proofs because they have more faith in tests - since they know how often their "proofs" are no no good they learned how to write bad proofs in school - their grades proved it! An easy way to avoid this problem is to make sure that the array size is relatively prime with respect to the value returned by hash2 in other words, these two serial and binary search in java must not have any common factor, apart from 1.
As I understand it, that's not a problem until the window size starts to become a significant fraction of the space of sequence numbers, since the wraparound is specified to Do The Right Thing. As I'm sure you're aware, Java does this to some degree, even though it doesn't eliminate the possibility of arithmetic overflow. It is not sufficient merely to prove a serial and binary search in java correct; you have to test it too. Another interesting problem in the same class is that of a wraparound counter, such as the bit quantity on Windows machines that wraps every 42 days. The nodes in a particular linked list will each have a key that hashes to the same value.
Serial and binary search in java animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation. In our example the student ID is the key, but other, more complex keys are sometimes used. If you can level that criticism at int, purely because of how it's named and how other people use it and what they may or not prescribe, then it becomes admissible to level the same sort of criticism at other elements of the language. I'm actually more interested in your response on a different issue, namely this remark pointed out by "crux":.
This is why the "algebra of programming" approach discussed here many times is so intersting and important. For example, if our array contains ten elements, then if we are searching for the target that occurs at the first serial and binary search in java, then there is just one array access. Suppose we no longer have a student IDbut we have instead. Even if you can blame the standard libraries for not attending to a ubiquitous need, who is the one who decides to use the standard libraries? An easy way to avoid this problem is to make sure that the array size is relatively prime with respect to the value returned by hash2 in other words, these two numbers must not have any common factor, apart from 1.
I'm actually more interested in your response on a different issue, namely this remark pointed out by "crux": I think that can only happen when the window size is greater than the sequence number space, but I may be missing somethingit's been a while. In this case, we may end up searching through all the records to find the target just as in serial search.
Since algebraic manipulation of code is such a desried goal, functional programming raises so much interest even though not everyone here thinks it is the holy grail. The sliding window protocol is only correct with unbounded sequence numbers but every implementation that I know about, TCP for example, uses bounded sequence numbers. Comment viewing options Flat list - collapsed Flat list - expanded Threaded list - collapsed Threaded list - expanded Date - newest first Date - oldest first 10 comments per page 30 comments per serial and binary search in java 50 comments per page 70 comments per serial and binary search in java 90 comments per page comments per page comments per page Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes. This would require a careful choice of new size and probably require each entry to have a new hash value computed.